Tuesday, January 12, 2010

Chinese Dollar Peg On The Ropes?


Inflation returns to China
Inflation returned to China last month after nearly a year of declining prices, presenting a potential headache to policymakers as they try to consolidate a strong economic recovery.

A series of data published on Friday indicated that the rebound remained firmly on track, with industrial production and imports both increasing well in advance of forecasts.

One of the main risks to face the economy is a surge in inflation as a result of the massive monetary and fiscal stimulus measures introduced this year.
Consumer prices rose 0.6 per cent last month from a year ago, after falling 0.5 per cent the month before, while prices at the factory gate fell 2.1 per cent last month compared with a 5.8 per cent decline the month before.


Several economists argued that the shift back to inflation was caused specifically by rising food costs, as well as by some rises in energy prices, rather than as a result of the money supply increasing at an annual rate of nearly 30 per cent.

However, the return of even modest inflation will feed into the intense discussion in Beijing about how quickly to ease stimulus measures and whether to abandon a de facto peg against the US dollar and to allow the renminbi to appreciate.
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/71e7aa2c-e613-11de-bcbe-00144feab49a.html

Probably the single biggest reason China has seen inflation rear it's ugly head is the Renminbi's peg to the US Dollar. The US Dollar is exporting inflation globally. By maintaining their peg to the Dollar, the Chinese are "inviting" inflation to their shores. Should China be forced to end their currency's peg to the Dollar to fight inflation on the Chinese Mainland, it will be a very dark day for the US Dollar.

A rising Chinese currency will heap massive pressure on the Dollar as the Chinese will be forced to dump their Dollars. This in turn will swamp a world already flooded with Dollars. A currency "event" of this nature could well be the catalyst that launches hyperinflation in the US Economy. Today's moves by the Chinese central bank to raise the reserve requirements of its banks is really gold positive despite today's knee-jerk reaction in the markets. Chinese central bankers are doing what is best for their economy in the hopes that they will prevent the economic calamity that the West unleashed on the World in 2008.

China raises bank reserve requirements
China has increased the amount banks must set aside as reserves in the clearest sign yet that the central bank is trying to tighten monetary conditions amid mounting concerns of overheating and inflation as a result of the credit boom.

The People’s Bank of China also raised interest rates modestly in the inter-bank market on Tuesday for the second time in less than a week, as it engages with commercial banks in a tug-of-war over rapid lending.

Reserve requirements were raised by 0.5 percentage points, while rates on one-year paper increased by 0.08 per cent and on three-month paper by 0.04 per cent.

The central bank is facing a number of worrying signals about inflationary pressures, including a rapid expansion of money supply with M1 increasing by 34.6 per cent in December year-on-year.

Two leading economists warned this week of the risk of inflation and said that the economy could grow by 16 per cent this year if the government did not withdraw some stimulus.
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/c49c6b12-ff82-11de-8f53-00144feabdc0.html

Mixed dollar action as traders react to China's lending changes
NEW YORK (MarketWatch) -- The dollar advanced against the Australian dollar and other high-yielding currencies Tuesday, but was little changed against the euro, after the People's Bank of China said it would require banks to hold more cash in reserve as it attempts to restrain credit growth.

The dollar index wavered between positive and negative territory during the session, and recently traded at 77.018, off from 76.991 in late North American trading Monday. The index gauges the performance of the greenback against a trade-weighted basket of six major currencies.

A number of factors resurrected a move by investors away from assets considered risky, including stocks and commodities, and into the perceived safety of the dollar and government bonds.

Besides the developments out of China, there were reports of more concerns about Greece's financial status and disappointing quarterly results reported by U.S. blue chip Alcoa.

The dollar dipped its toe into negative territory against the euro during the session amid some weak second-tier data in the U.S. and shifting of positions, analysts said.

Separately, the Labor Department said the number of unemployed people per U.S. job openings rose to the highest on record in November.

Coupled with other data, "it seems that the U.S. economy is far from a period of consistent job creation," said David Watt, senior fixed income and currency strategist at RBC Capital Markets. "I think the U.S. dollar just has a heavy undertow and that it takes a lot of effort to keep it afloat, despite some dreadful news on other currencies."
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/dollar-holds-gains-vs-euro-but-slips-vs-yen-2010-01-12

Gold drops as China hikes bank reserves
Gold fell below $1,130 (U.S.) an ounce Tuesday, losing 2 per cent as the news of China's tightening monetary policy curbed economic optimism, triggering heavy technical selling.

“Gold's decline has a lot to do with China's raising reserve requirements. It was massive liquidation after prices fell below important technical levels,” said Bruce Dunn, vice-president of trading at New Jersey-based Auramet.

Technical selling dragged prices lower after spot bullion fell below its 50-day moving average at $1,130, analysts said. Support could be seen at its 100-day moving average at $1,074 an ounce.

China took its strongest step towards tightening monetary policy with an increase in banks' required reserves. The move came just days after China reported robust trade figures and was the first time that the central bank had adjusted the ratio since a cut in December, 2008.

A rise in interest rates, while seen by few as imminent, is nonetheless the next logical move, analysts said. U.S. rates slumped to historic lows in the fallout of the global economic slump triggered in 2007.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-investor/gold-drops-as-china-hikes-bank-reserves/article1428684/

Many will imply that "rising interest rates" will halt Gold's rise. Not so fast I would suggest. Only if interest rats rise faster than inflation will interest rates interrupt Gold's rise. Today's dumping of Gold was absolute folly. Chinese efforts to slow their nations rate of growth have seldom amounted to much of a dent in their nation's growth rate. China will remain a world leader in growth prospects despite today's token gesture to reining in growth. If anything, China's announcement today only reaffirms Gold's status as the "global currency of choice.

John Hussman of the Hussman funds came out recently with this commentary. This man is much admired and followed :

"As I wrote several weeks ago, the Federal Reserve has expanded the U.S. monetary base by more than 150% since the beginning of the recession. That is not a typo. The monetary base has soared from $800 billion to over $2 trillion. Much of this has been accomplished through outright purchases of mortgage-backed securities (not repurchases) and an equivalent creation of base money. Unless these securities can be sold back out into private hands for the same value that was paid to acquire them, the Fed will have effectively forced the U.S. government to make its implicit guarantee of these agency securities explicit, without the authorization of Congress. To the extent that the underlying mortgages default, the U.S. government will be forced to issue additional Treasuries to retire the mortgage backed securities now held by the Fed. Alternatively, if the U.S. does not explicitly bail out Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to the full extent, the Fed will have created money, with no recourse, and without the equivalent backing of assets or securities on its books. In short, the Fed is now engaging in unlegislated, back-door fiscal policy."

"What is likely, in my view, is that we will observe far greater issuance of government liabilities, which will predictably create a near doubling of the consumer price index in the coming decade (though probably not for a few years due to credit concerns, which dampen monetary velocity). It is notable that the massive expansion of government liabilities beginning in the late-1960's eventually exploded into uncontrollable inflation by the late 1970's. There are lags between the creation of government liabilities and their inflationary effects. But to expand these liabilities as recklessly as the Fed and Treasury are now doing is to undermine the long-term foundations of the economy."

And therein lies the foundation of support in the Gold price. The Chinese can tinker with their interest rates and bank reserve requirements all they want, but is the continuing debasement of the US Dollar by the Federal Reserve and the US Treasury that guarantee the price of Gold is going to rise substantially going forward in time. There is no "safety" in the US Dollar and US Treasury's no matter the "perception" to the contrary.

3 comments:

  1. Thanks for that Wealth of information!!! At this very moment I just added you to my blog roll ...
    Do we see a gold bubble?

    ReplyDelete
  2. By the way, here's another one where I just put a reference to your above post:
    Economic Fallacy I: Harmful Currency Undervaluation?

    ReplyDelete
  3. 家 文件 联络 录影


    加拿大(RBC银行)的皇家银行: 公司恶霸
    $100,000 -差错(渔夫的贷款)
    我的贷款是为$38,000在与主要付款的5年期间$7,600每年加上兴趣, 3%在最初之上。 总兴趣年是大约$500个x12月= $6,000加上$7,600校长。 这个总和的$13,600是有偿的,一旦逐年与需求分期付款式贷款合同一致。

    这笔贷款与季节性就业是一致的,您的收入非定常。

    皇家银行邮寄了一封信给我10个月入请求这笔的贷款我有过期月度的利息支付。 它口头上未曾被谈论或键入在这个放款合同,那兴趣将月度被支付。

    皇家银行根据这个论据与活期贷款协议或合同是相关的期限和条件。 放款合同关于付款指南缺乏足够的细节(月度兴趣和付款日期); 因此这使所有贷款期限和条件无效。

    我拒绝同意他们; 因此,皇家银行占领了我32 '我使用作为在这笔贷款的安全的玻璃纤维渔船。 皇家银行为50%真实的市场价值卖了我的小船。 落我的小船和收入的损失也造成了我我的房子丢失的归属。

    皇家银行卖了我的房子低于评估加上雇用一家地方公司处理我的在这物产的设备。 皇家银行职员以后陈述了我的设备被采取了对地方转储。 我发现了我的设备被卖了和未被处理。 最终,我必须归档个人破产。 早先对此我有无缺点的信用。

    我与调查我的怨言的调解官(Wendy骑士联系, RBC财团,多伦多,安大略)。 这次调查认为,她在这个案件不可能提出建议和因而下降了我的怨言。 我的下一个步骤与OBSI (银行业务&投资的调解官联系)。 他们也倾向了RBC调解官的更低的决定。

    两组织未曾与或问了签署这笔贷款的贷款经理(RBC)联系。 这些组织全部由银行业资助; 因此,他们完成的所有调查可能被偏心倾向于银行。

    签这个合同的贷款经理工作加拿大的皇家银行的18年。 这名雇员由加拿大的皇家银行放弃了或射击。

    底线是加拿大的皇家银行被做差错在导致我财政废墟的地方水平。

    参加“委屈委员会”反对加拿大无能力皇家银行。 这个委员会将追求财政reimbursment给皇家银行的不满意的客户。 请叫保罗Fraser在902-565-3521或给mailto:coldwaterfish@ns.sympatico.ca?subject=Website%3A%20

    此致敬意,
    保罗G Fraser
    悉尼, NS

    如果您是对支持我的起因、电话或者电子邮件感兴趣:

    RBC Gordon尼克松,多伦多(416) 974-6415总统,
    RBC SalesI,安妮Lockie,多伦多(416) 974-6821副总统,
    RBC省,格雷戈Grice总统,大西洋(902) 421-8112 greg.grice@rbc.com
    RBC经理、海角不列塔尼人或者东新斯科舍,杰瑞Rankin (902) 567-8600
    RBC省,布赖恩Conway副总统,大西洋(902) 491-4302 brian.conway@rbc.com
    RBC地区, Tammy荷兰副总统,哈利法克斯(902) 421-8112 tammy.holland@rbc.com
    RBC高级管理人员、媒介&公共关系, Beja Rodeck (416) 974-5506 beja.rodeck@rbc.com
    RBC调解官, Wendy骑士,多伦多,安大略1-800-769-2542 ombudsman@rbc.com
    银行业务&投资,乔安妮Olafson,多伦多, 1-888-451-4519 ombudsman@obsi.ca的调解官

    ReplyDelete